It's just lazy.
I dont care how down to earth or likeable a main character is. When the perspective comes across like every woman they encounter is either lusting after them, or being sized-up and put into different categories of dream-girl archetypes, it turns the otherwise relatable main character into a leering creep.
Can you imagine reading a book where every male character was introduced as simple archetypes like "bad boy type", or by the size of thier package, despite thier role in the story?
Edit: If it matters, I also like women and get the appeal of reading about boobies, but I dont need to know about every booby if said booby isnt important to the story.
Edit #2: I'm sorry I cant respond to y'all, I'm only human!
If you like your books filled with dream girls and ladies who breast boobily, power to you. You read those books, and I will choose others. The authors will still.make money, and I dont have to finish an off-putting book. Everyone wins!
Yes, romance books and books with sex and lust being part of the story are not worthy of scorn and obviously get a pass.
I'm personally going to continue to think its weird and off-putting when a book in which sex and lust is NOT the story (in which the main character is NOT intended to be sex obsessed) clearly chooses to reduce a specific group of people in the book (women) down to sexual fantasies.
This site only for you and only just for fun. For you, who love fun and laughter.
About site content
Site content is 18+. Site content is not unique and is a compilation of information from different resources. There is no moderation when adding content.
The creator of the site, neither as e wants to hurt the feelings of believers, sexual minorities and other groups of users. If all the same you felt hurt, I'm sorry.